In Other Worlds Essays In Culture Political Of Space
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (born 24 February 1942) is an Indian scholar, literary theorist, and feminist critic. She is University Professor at Columbia University, where she is a founding member of the Institute for Comparative Literature and Society.
Considered one of the most influential postcolonial intellectuals, Spivak is best known for her essay Can the Subaltern Speak? and for her translation of and introduction to Jacques Derrida's De la grammatologie. She also translated such works of Mahasweta Devi as Imaginary Maps and Breast Stories into English and with separate critical appreciation on the texts and Devi's life and writing style in general.
Spivak was awarded the 2012 Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy for being "a critical theorist and educator speaking for the humanities against intellectual colonialism in relation to the globalized world." In 2013, she received the Padma Bhushan, the third highest civilian award given by the Republic of India.
Spivak was born Gayatri Chakravorty in Calcutta, India, to Pares Chandra and Sivani Chakravorty. Spivak's great grandfather Pratap Chandra Majumdar had been Sri Ramakrishna’s doctor. Her father Paresh Chandra Chakrabarti was "initiated (given diksha)" by Sri Sarada Devi, and her mother Sivani Chakrabarti, by Swami Shivananda. After completing her secondary education at St. John's Diocesan Girls' Higher Secondary School, Spivak attended Presidency College, Kolkata under the University of Calcutta, from which she graduated in 1959.
In 1961, Spivak joined the graduate program in English at Cornell University, travelling on money borrowed on a so-called “life mortgage.” In 1962, unable to secure financial aid from the department of English, she transferred to Comparative Literature, a new program at Cornell, under the guidance of its first Director, Paul de Man, with insufficient preparation in French and German. Her dissertation, advised by Paul de Man, was on W.B. Yeats and titled Myself Must I Remake: The Life and Poetry of W.B. Yeats. In 1959, upon graduation, she secured employment as an English tutor for forty hours a week. Her MA thesis was on the representation of innocence in Wordsworth with M.H. Abrams. In 1963-64, she attended Girton College, Cambridge, as a research student under the supervision of Professor T.R. Henn, writing on the representation of the stages of development of the lyric subject in the poetry of William Butler Yeats. She presented a course in the summer of 1963 on “Yeats and the Theme of Death” at the Yeats Summer School in Sligo, Ireland. (She returned there in 1987 to present Yeats’ position within post-coloniality.)
In the Fall of 1965, Spivak became an assistant professor in the department of English, University of Iowa. She received tenure in 1970. She did not publish her doctoral dissertation, but decided to write a critical book on Yeats that would be accessible to her undergraduate students without compromising her intellectual positions. The result is her first book, written for young adults, Myself I Must Remake: The Life and Poetry of W.B. Yeats.
In 1967, on her regular attempts at self-improvement, Spivak purchased a book, by an author unknown to her, entitled De la grammatologie. She decided to translate the book by an unknown author, and wrote a long translator’s preface. This publication was immediately a success, and the Translator’s Preface became popular across the world as an introduction to the philosophy of deconstruction launched by the author, Jacques Derrida; whom Spivak met in 1971.
In 1974, at the University of Iowa, Spivak founded the MFA in Translation in the department of Comparative Literature . The following year, she became the Director of the Program in Comparative Literature and was promoted to full professorship. In 1978, she was National Humanities Professor at the University of Chicago. She received many subsequent residential visiting professorships and fellowships.
In 1978, she moved to the University of Texas at Austin as professor of English and Comparative Literature. In 1982, she was appointed as the Longstreet Professor in English and Comparative Literature at Emory University. In 1986, she went to the University of Pittsburgh as the first Mellon Professor of English. Here she established the Cultural Studies program. In 1991, she joined Columbia University as Avalon Foundation Professor in the Humanities, where, in 2007, she was made University Professor in the Humanities.
Spivak has received 11 honorary doctorates: University of Toronto, University of London, Oberlin College, Universitat Rovira Virgili, Rabindra Bharati University, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, University of St Andrews, Université de Vincennes à Saint-Denis, Presidency University, Yale University, University of Ghana-Legon. In 2012, she became the only Indian recipient of the Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy in the category of Arts and Philosophy.
Spivak has served on the advisory board of numerous academic journals, including differences, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, and Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies.
Apart from Derrida, Spivak has also translated the fiction of the Bengali author, Mahasweta Devi; the poetry of the 18-century Bengali poet Ram Prashad Sen; and most recently A Season in the Congo by Aimé Césaire, poet, essayist and statesman from Martinique. In 1997 she received a prize for translation into English from the Sahitya Akadami—the National Academy of Literature in India.
Her essay, Can the Subaltern Speak?, (1983) established Spivak among the ranks of feminists who consider history, geography, and class when thinking about women. In all her work, Spivak’s main effort has been to try to find ways of accessing the subjectivity of those who are being investigated. She is hailed as a critic who has feminized and globalized the philosophy of deconstruction, considering the position of the subaltern, a word used by Antonio Gramsci as describing ungeneralizable fringe groups of society who lack access to citizenship. In the early 80s, she was also hailed as a co-founder of postcolonial theory, which she refused to accept fully, as has been demonstrated in her book Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Towards a History of the Vanishing Present (1999), which suggests that so-called postcolonial theory should be considered from the point of view of who uses it in what interest. Spivak’s other works are: In Other Worlds (1987), Outside in the Teaching Machine (1993), Death of a Discipline (2003), Other Asias (2008), and An Aesthetic Education in the Age of Globalization (2012).
Since 1986, Spivak has been engaged in teaching and training adults and children among the landless illiterates on the border of West Bengal and Bihar/Jharkhand. This sustained attempt to access the epistemologies damaged by the millennial oppression of the caste system has allowed her to understand the situation of globality as well as the limits of high theory more clearly. In 1997, her friend Lore Metzger, a survivor of the Third Reich, left her $10,000 in her will, to help with the work of rural education. With this, Spivak established the Pares Chandra and Sivani Chakravorty Memorial Foundation for Rural Education; to which she contributed the majority of her Kyoto Prize.
In "Can the Subaltern Speak?" Spivak discusses the lack of an account of the Sati practice, leading her to reflect on whether the subaltern can even speak. Spivak writes about the process, the focus on the Eurocentric Subject as they disavow the problem of representation; and by invoking the Subject of Europe, these intellectuals constitute the subaltern Other of Europe as anonymous and mute.
Spivak rose to prominence with her translation of Derrida's De la grammatologie, which included a translator's introduction that has been described as "setting a new standard for self-reflexivity in prefaces." After this, as a member of the "Subaltern Studies Collective," she carried out a series of historical studies and literary critiques of imperialism and international feminism. She has often referred to herself as a "practical Marxist-feminist-deconstructionist." Her predominant ethico-political concern has been for the space occupied by the subaltern, especially subaltern women, both in discursive practices and in institutions of Western cultures. Edward Said wrote of Spivak's work, "She pioneered the study in literary theory of non-Western women and produced one of the earliest and most coherent accounts of that role available to us."
Her A Critique of Postcolonial Reason, published in 1999, explores how major works of European metaphysics (e.g., Kant, Hegel) not only tend to exclude the subaltern from their discussions, but actively prevent non-Europeans from occupying positions as fully human subjects.
Spivak coined the term "strategic essentialism," which refers to a sort of temporary solidarity for the purpose of social action. For example, women's groups have many different agendas that potentially make it difficult for feminists to work together for common causes; "Strategic essentialism" allows for disparate groups to accept temporarily an "essentialist" position that enables them able to act cohesively.
However, while others have built upon this idea of "strategic essentialism," Spivak has been unhappy with the ways the concept has been taken up and used. In interviews, she has disavowed the term, although she has not completely deserted the concept itself.
She has been a Guggenheim fellow, has received numerous academic honours including an honorary doctorate from Oberlin College, and has been on the editorial board of academic journals such as boundary 2. In March 2007, Columbia University President Lee Bollinger appointed Spivak University Professor, the institution's highest faculty rank. In a letter to the faculty, he wrote,
Not only does her world-renowned scholarship—grounded in deconstructivist literary theory—range widely from critiques of post-colonial discourse to feminism, Marxism, and globalization; her lifelong search for fresh insights and understanding has transcended the traditional boundaries of discipline while retaining the fire for new knowledge that is the hallmark of a great intellect.
Spivak's writing has received some criticism, including the suggestion that her work puts style ahead of substance. It has been argued in her defense, however, that this sort of criticism reveals an unwillingness to substantively engage with her texts.Judith Butler has noted that Spivak's supposedly complex language has, in fact, resonated with and profoundly changed the thinking of "tens of thousands of activists and scholars." On the other hand, Terry Eagleton has lamented that "If colonial societies endure what Spivak calls ‘a series of interruptions, a repeated tearing of time that cannot be sutured’, much the same is true of her own overstuffed, excessively elliptical prose. She herself, unsurprisingly, reads the book’s broken-backed structure in just this way, as an iconoclastic departure from ‘accepted scholarly or critical practice’. But the ellipses, the heavy-handed jargon, the cavalier assumption that you know what she means, or that if you don’t she doesn’t much care, are as much the overcodings of an academic coterie as a smack in the face for conventional scholarship."
In speeches given and published since 2002, Spivak has addressed the issue of terrorism and suicide bombings. With the aim of bringing an end to suicide bombings, she has explored and "tried to imagine what message [such acts] might contain," ruminating that "suicidal resistance is a message inscribed in the body when no other means will get through." One critic has suggested that this sort of stylised language may serve to blur important moral issues relating to terrorism. However, Spivak stated in the same speech that "single coerced yet willed suicidal 'terror' is in excess of the destruction of dynastic temples and the violation of women, tenacious and powerfully residual. It has not the banality of evil. It is informed by the stupidity of belief taken to extreme."
- Myself Must I Remake: The Life and Poetry of W.B. Yeats (1974).
- Of Grammatology (translation, with a critical introduction, of Derrida's text) (1976)
- In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics (1987).
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1988). Can the subaltern speak?. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Selected Subaltern Studies (edited with Ranajit Guha) (1988)
- The Post-Colonial Critic – Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues (1990)
- Outside in the Teaching Machine (1993).
- The Spivak Reader (1995).
- A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present (1999).
- Death of a Discipline (2003).
- Other Asias (2008).
- An Aesthetic Education in the Era of Globalization (2012).
- Readings (2014).
- Imaginary Maps (translation with critical introduction of three stories by Mahasweta Devi) (1994)
- Breast Stories (translation with critical introduction of three stories by Mahasweta Devi) (1997)
- Old Women (translation with critical introduction of two stories by Mahasweta Devi) (1999)
- Song for Kali: A Cycle (translation with introduction of story by Ramproshad Sen) (2000)
- Chotti Munda and His Arrow (translation with critical introduction of the novel by Mahasweta Devi) (2002)
- Red Thread (forthcoming)
- ^"Spivak, Gayatri." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014.
- ^"Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak". Department of English and Comparative Literature. Columbia University in the City of New York. Retrieved March 22, 2016.
- ^Simons, Jon (2010-09-10). From Agamben to Zizek: Contemporary Critical Theorists: Contemporary Critical Theorists. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 9780748643264.
- ^Morton, Stephen (2010). Simons, Jon, ed. From Agamben To Zizek Contemporary Critical Theorists. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. p. 210. ISBN 978-0-7486-3973-1.
- ^"The Kyoto Prize / Laureates / Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak". Inamori Foundation. Inamori Foundation. Archived from the original on 16 March 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2016.
- ^"Columbia University Professor Gayatri Spivak Selected as 2012 Kyoto Prize Laureate in Arts and Philosophy". Kyoto Symposium Organization. Kyoto Prize USA. Retrieved 19 April 2016.
- ^"Professor Gayatri Spivak Selected as 2012 Kyoto Prize Laureate in Arts and Philosophy". Columbia News. Columbia University. Retrieved 19 April 2016.
- ^"Padma Awards Announced". Ministry of Home Affairs (India). 25 January 2013. Retrieved 25 January 2013.
- ^ abcLandry, Donna; MacLean, Gerald, eds. (1996). "Reading Spivak". The Spivak Reader. New York: Routledge. pp. 1–4. ISBN 0415910013. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- ^Das, Soumitra; Basu, Anasuya; Basu, Jayanta (17 June 2012). "Damning evidence of books". The Telegraph. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- ^MYSELF MUST I REMAKE: The Life and Poetry of W. B. Yeats by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak | Kirkus Reviews.
- ^"Gayatri Spivak on Derrida, the subaltern, and her life and work". e-flux conversations. Retrieved 2018-03-09.
- ^"differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies". Duke University Press. Retrieved 2017-08-21.
- ^"Masthead". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2012-08-22. Retrieved 2017-08-21.
- ^"Project MUSE - Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies". muse.jhu.edu. Retrieved 2017-08-21.
- ^Gutenberg, Project. "List of Sahitya Akademi Award winners for Bengali | Project Gutenberg Self-Publishing - eBooks | Read eBooks online". self.gutenberg.org. Retrieved 2018-03-09.
- ^Sharp, J. (2008). "Chapter 6, Can the Subaltern Speak?". Geographies of Postcolonialism. SAGE Publications.
- ^"Reading Spivak". The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Routledge. 1996. pp. 1–4.
- ^Lahiri, Bulan (6 February 2011). "Speaking to Spivak". The Hindu. Chennai, India. Retrieved 7 February 2011.
- ^Dinitia Smith, "Creating a Stir Wherever She Goes,"New York Times (9 February 2002) B7.
- ^Chakravorty., Spivak, Gayatri (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason : toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674177642. OCLC 40105116.
- ^Danius, Sara; Jonsson, Stefan; Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1993). "An Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak". boundary 2. 20 (2): 24–50. doi:10.2307/303357.
- ^"Strategic Essentialism". Literary Theory and Criticism Notes. 2016-04-09. Retrieved 2018-03-09.
- ^Oberlin College Commencement 2011 – Oberlin College. Oberlin.edu. Retrieved on 21 June 2011.
- ^Clarity Is King – Eric Adler on Postmodernists' Limpid Bursts. New Partisan. Retrieved on 21 June 2011.
- ^Death sentences. New Statesman. Retrieved on 21 June 2011.
- ^"letters". London Review of Books. 21 (12). 10 June 1999.
- ^"letters". London Review of Books. 21 (13). 1 July 1999.
- ^Terry Eagleton, "In the Gaudy Supermarket," London Review of Books (13 May 1999).
- ^ abc"Terror: A Speech After 9-11". boundary 2. Duke University Press. 31 (2): 93. 2004.
- ^Alexander, Edward (10 January 2003). "Evil educators defend the indefensible". Jerusalem Post.
- Chakravorty Spivak, Gayatri; Landry, Donna; MacLean, Gerald M. (1996). The Spivak Reader: Selected Works. Routledge.
- Spivak, Gayatri (1997). ""In a Word": interview". In Nicholson, Linda. The Second Wave: a Reader in Feminist Theory. Ellen Rooney. New York: Routledge. pp. 356–378. ISBN 9780415917612.
- Milevska, Suzana (January 2005). "Resistance That Cannot be Recognised as Such: Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak". n.paradoxa: International Feminist Art Journal. 15: 6–12.
- Iuliano, Fiorenzo (2012). Altri mondi, altre parole. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak tra decostruzione e impegno militante (in Italian). OmbreCorte. ISBN 9788897522362.
Template:Kyoto Prize in Arts and Philosophy — Thought and Ethics
In Other Worlds: Essays in CulturalPolitics Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak Routledge; 309 pp.; $12.95 (paper) Gayatri Spivak ends her book with a theatrical metaphor: I hope these pages have made clear that, in the mise-en-scene where the text persistently rehearses itself, writer and reader are both upstaged. If the teacher clandestinely carves out a piece of acdon by using the text as a tool, it is only in celebration of the text's apartness (itre-d-l'dcart).Paradoxically, this apartness makes the text susceptible to a history larger than that of the writer, reader, teacher. In that scene of writing, the authority of the author, however seductively down-to-earth, must be content to stand in the wings. The theatre functions here as the exemplary process in which authority and hierarchy are physically inscribed. Who gets "upstaged" and who gets "a piece of the action" are Spivak's central concerns throughout In Other Worlds. An avowed "feminist, Marxist deconstructivist," Spivak (who translated Derrida's Of Grammatology) eschews the humanist notion of the sovereign subject. As Colin MacCabe writes in his foreword, the book "does not merely state that we are formed in constitutive contradictions and that our identities are the effects of heterogenous signifying practices: its analyses start from and work towards contradiction and heterogeneity." The fourteen essays and literary translations are divided into three progressively expansive sections. In the first of these, "Literature," Spivak develops readings of Coleridge, Dante, Woolf, and Wordsworth, calling into question the ideal of neutral and disinterested criticism. The last essay in this section, "Feminism and Critical Theory," sets forth her suspicion of essentialism and her aim to "investigate the hidden ethico-political agenda of differentiations constitutive of knowledge and judgement." With "Into the World," the second part, Spivak takes the inevitable step from literary text to social text: Here I must stress that I am also not interested in answers to questions like "What is the nature of the aesthetic?" or "How indeed are we to understand 'life'?" My concern rather is that: 1) The formulation of such questions is itself a determined and determining gesture. 2) Very generally speaking, literary people are still 238 caught within a position where they must say: Life is brute fact and outside art; the aesthetic is free and transcends life. 3) This declaration is the condition and effect of "ideology." 4) If "literary studies" is to have any meaning in the coming decade, its ideology might have to be questioned. In Part Three, "Entering the Third World," Spivak examines the colonialist politics of Third World studies through analyses of two short stories by Mahasweta Devi and of work by the Subaltern Studies Group. This elegant movement outward accrues its own force of argument. Each piece builds on the last, developing the book's themes across essays as well as within them. By the end, Spivak has persuasively demonstrated that the literary text and the social text are intermingled; that all acts of criticism, history-writing, and teaching are political; and, finally, that First World critics, historians, and teachers tend to be entrenched in a benignly colonialist ideology that homogenizes Third World literature and culture. This book is fiercely theoretical, taking up the mind-bending philosophical intricacies of anti-humanism and post-structuralism. Spivak is as capable of extremely abstract, nested analyses as she is of succinctness. And yet the book is far from bloodless. What makes Spivak's thought so engaging is that she herself inhabits a space of contradiction, of irreducible heterogeneity. As an Indian woman teaching English at the University of Pittsburgh, she is a First World feminist writing of Third World women's literature; she is an academic deconstructing the academy; she is a Marxist living in capitalism. Her persistent, passionate deconstruction of the critic/historian/teacher's position as subject and master over the object of study applies to her own analyses as well. This paradox-that we can never fully know our own ideological provenance as we deconstruct the ideological limits of something under study-is central to her book. Spivak's essays span 1977 to 1987. Deconstruction peaked during that time, with the translations of Derrida and his...